The Result Of A Plea Agreement

The question of the extent to which innocent people accept a plea and plead guilty is controversial and has been the subject of an action. Many researches have focused on relatively unproven cases where innocence has subsequently been proven, such as successful appeals to murder and rape on the basis of DNA evidence, which are generally atypical for trials as a whole (by nature only the most serious types of crimes). Other studies have focused on presenting hypothetical situations to subjects and the choice they would make. More recently, some studies have attempted to examine the real reactions of innocent people in general when faced with real advocacy decisions. A study by Dervan and Edkins (2013) attempted to recreate a true controlled advocacy situation, rather than requiring theoretical answers to a theoretical situation – a common approach in previous research. [14] She put the subjects in a situation where a charge of academic fraud (fraud) could be laid, some of which were in fact man of the order (and knew it), and some were innocent, but were apparently confronted with solid evidence of guilt and had no verifiable evidence of innocence. Each subject was presented with evidence of guilt and offered the choice between reviewing an academic ethics committee and perhaps a great deal of punishment with respect to additional courses and other effect, or admitting guilt and accepting a lighter “sentence.” The study showed that, as predicted in the court statistics, about 90% of the accused, who were actually guilty, decided to enter a plea and plead guilty. It also noted that about 56% of those who were truly innocent (and who knew him in private) also make their pleas and plead guilty for reasons such as prevention of formal judicial proceedings, insecurity, the possibility of significant damage to future personal projects or the withdrawal of the domestic environment due to remediation courses. The authors stated: [14] In the accused, the accused plead guilty to committing a lesser crime than the original charge against them. In the charges, they plead guilty to a set of several initial charges.

In criminal negotiations, they plead guilty to agreeing in advance what sentence is imposed; However, this sentence may still be denied by the judge. In fact, at trial, the accused pleads guilty, but the prosecutor agrees to confirm or admit certain facts that influence the way the accused is punished under the criminal guidelines. (c) to plead not guilty when charged; The prosecutor`s superior duty is… to see that justice is done. Procedures must dominate public and judicial confidence. Many defendants in serious and complex fraud cases are represented by lawyers involved in commercial disputes, including negotiations. This means that the defendant is generally protected from undue pressure to argue. The greatest danger to be protected in these cases is to persuade the prosecutor to accept a plea or a basis that is not in the public interest and in the interest of justice, because it does not adequately reflect the seriousness of the insult…