Why Did Colonists Form Committees To Enforce Non Importation Agreements

Homespun Clothing quickly became a sign of virtue and patriotism, and women were an important part of this cultural change. At the same time, British products and luxury goods, which were once coveted, have become symbols of tyranny. Non-import agreements, and in particular non-consumption, changed the cultural relations of the settlers with the metropolis. Inspection committees that monitored merchants and residents to ensure that no one broke the agreements. Offenders could expect their names and misdemeanours to be ashamed in newspapers and in large pages. In response to the non-import Boston agreement, Parliament finally struck down the Townshend Revenue Act taxes on all products except tea. The non-import agreements of the years leading up to the American Revolution were an effective tactic to protest British policy and put the Boston Patriots first and demonstrate to other colonies the potential for joint action. Following the successful boycott that Boston launched in 1768 with the Boston non-Import Agreement, the First Continental Congress of 1774 would pass a colonial ban on all trade with Great Britain. As early as 1766, the practice of non-import agreements against the importation and trade with Great Britain of the cities of the American colonies was adopted. The sons of freedom were proponents of the application of non-import agreements and other similar boycott tactics. The Stamp Act was repealed because of joint non-import agreements by U.S. colonies. New York merchants first implemented the non-import agreement to protest the Stamp Act, and they managed to convince merchants in other cities to do the same.

Boston was one of the new York merchant cities that were convinced to participate in the non-import agreement to fight the Stamp Act. Following the successful boycott and pressure from British traders who lost money, Britain gave in and eventually cancelled the Stamp Act. In 1770, Boston merchants tried unsuccessfully to renew the non-import agreement. In May, they learned that Parliament had abolished customs duties on townshends (with the exception of the tea tax). The non-import movement rapidly collapsed, and the settlers were even the most patriotic settlers who wanted to consume their British luxury again. Until October 1770 the non-import died, but not for long. The resistance again led to the lifting. In March 1770, Parliament lifted all new tariffs, with the exception of the tea obligation, which, like the Declaration Act, was left in its face and affirmed that Parliament still retains the right to tax the colonies. The character of the colonial resistance had changed between 1765 and 1770.

During the Stamp Act resistance, elites wrote determinations and held conventions, while violent and popular mobs burned images and demolished houses, with minimal coordination between settlements. But methods of resistance to Townshend`s actions have become more inclusive and coordinated. Settlers, previously excluded from significant political participation, collected signatures and settlers of all stripes participated in the resistance by not purchasing British products. Women, too, have engaged in unprecedented opposition to the Townshend Acts. They distributed subscription lists and collected signatures. The first political press articles of women were published. Without new imports of British clothing, the settlers also wore simple clothes, spun at home. Spinning clubs have been created, where local women gather at home and turn the rag for homespun clothes for their families and even for the community.